Anyone can miss a deadline, it’s happened to us all but when
you have a team member who consistently misses deadlines, you have a problem
that you need to address. Be sure that the team member has the same
understanding of their deadline as you before taking action; a work assignment
and deadline for the assignment constitute a contract between you and your team
member and the contract must be agreed upon. The deadline must be clearly
stated and the team member must agree that they can and will meet it. It’s time
for action if you’ve clearly stated the deadlines and your team member has
agreed to meet them.
The first question to ask is: is my team member capable of
meeting the timelines you’ve given them? The answer to this question will guide
your actions. One way of measuring your team member’s ability to meet the
deadline is to have a consultant, either on the team or external to it, assess
the work package to determine the effort necessary to complete it. An estimate
of the effort required will allow you to determine whether the duration allowed
was reasonable. Be sure the consultant has all the information they need, both
about the work and about the resource assigned to it. You’ll get different
estimates for junior, intermediate, and senior resources.
If the time you’ve allowed your resource to do the work is
less than reasonable, you may need to re-visit all your estimates. At the
least, you’ll need to re-visit all the estimates for that resource. If the
resource is identified as a senior performer and performance indicates a more
junior one, you may need to consider training for the resource to improve their
performance. The training might be formal such as courses, or informal such
mentoring or coaching. Remember that when a senior resource is engaged in
mentoring a more junior one, their productivity will be severely impaired so
make allowances. Consider replacing the resource with a senior resource if
that’s possible. At the very least, you’ll need to move this resource from the
critical path or partner them with a senior resource capable of meeting the
deadlines and mentoring your poor performer. If you were told a contract
resource performed at a senior level and they actually perform at an
intermediate or junior level, you have a problem with your source which should
be addressed. Remember that your goal is to be influential and achieving this
goal has a down side: no-one wants to disappoint you so they may agree to an
unreasonably short deadline.
You may be dealing with a lack of experience in a particular
skill set, that is the team member may be a senior programmer but have very
little experience in data query languages. Your project should have provisions
for training and now may be the time to utilize them. It’s always better to
have training occur before the skill is actually required, but if the need for
training is only discovered when it’s needed, and the team member is otherwise
a valuable asset, you may be left with no other choice than to provide the
needed training. Consider replacing the resource with one with the required
skill set if tight timelines don’t permit training time. Consider going back to
the source for a contractor, and demand that they replace the resource with one
having the required skills (providing you identified the required skill in the
first place).
The extreme case is where you’re dealing with a resource
with all the skills and experience required to meet your deadlines, but is
either too lazy to meet them or is actively trying to sabotage your project!
Observe the behavior of the team member. Are they spending an unreasonable
amount of time socializing? Are they constantly visiting other members of the
team (or other teams) and chatting with them? Have you received complaints from
other team members that your problem child is constantly pestering them and
interrupting their work? If you encounter any of these symptoms, it’s time for
a one-on-one meeting with the resource. Once again, you need to tread carefully
here. Consult your Human Resources organization’s policies, guidelines, and
standards; you may even want to ask for help from an HR representative. Take
the team member aside and clearly articulate the impact of the missed deadlines
on the project. Be polite but firm. You’re not asking to engage in a debate
here, the conversation should be one sided, you talking and the poor performer
listening. Now move on to the behavior you’ve observed and relate the behavior
to the missed deadlines (e.g. "I’ve observed you over the past few days and
you’ve spent at least 20% of your time chatting with other team members. I
believe that’s the reason for the missed deadlines”).
Outline how the team member is to improve their performance
next. The outline should emphasize the importance of meeting deadlines. You are
much less concerned with behavior than results. You’ll need to address the
behavior where you have received complaints from other team members or from
people external to the team. Be clear that the behavior change must succeed in
eliminating future complaints without identifying those who complained.
Identify the next work package (or the one the poor performer is currently
working on) as the pilot. They need to succeed at delivering that package on
time, or identify any impediments that would prevent them from meeting their
deadline. Ensure that the team member agrees to the actions you identify and
schedule a follow up to ensure their corrective action is on track. Lastly, you
should record this meeting so that the poor performance and the agreed upon
corrective actions are documented.
Not all poor performers are interested in improving their
performance. Where you are dealing with a team member with a hidden agenda, or
someone who simply cannot take direction, escalate the problem to your project’s
sponsors and let them help you deal with the problem. It’s always a good idea
to identify what you’d like to see them do before escalating. Do you want the
resource replaced with a better one? Have you identified the resource you’d
like to add to the team? Can the sponsor succeed in affecting a
performance/attitude improvement where you’ve failed? You should also be
prepared to articulate the risk to the project if this resource is allowed to
continue sabotaging the project. The ultimate tool in the Human Resource
management tool kit is firing. This should only be used as a last resort and,
if you are dealing with a permanent employee, you’ll need to engage the Human
Resources department. Only when the HR department approve of a firing will you
be allowed to go ahead with this. Usually, HR departments have a strict set of
criteria for firing an employee and you’ll need to meet those criteria. The
exception to this rule is when you’re dealing with a contract resource. Your
agreement with the personnel agency should provide you with the authority to
dismiss the resource if their performance doesn’t meet requirements.
The PMBOK® describes best practices in the Human
Resource Management area. Take the Project Management Professional (PMP®) to
demonstrate you’ve mastered all the best practices described in the PMBOK®. You can
learn more about the certification process and get PMP® Exam
Preparation training on our website at: http://www.threeo.ca